2004 August | Torley Lives - Part 2

Torley Lives

I amplify your awesome. Happy lives FTW!

2004-08-22
A special thankyou to Blog-City, Avril rocks, J-pop, supersaw
I've had this blog for a few Earth-months now and just wanted to make it clear I appreciate and am thankful to Blog-City for hosting it. I always knew there was something different about them, ever since the time I started customizing.?I wish them and all of this domain much honor and prosperity. I don't quite recall why I wanted to have a blog in the first place, but I did know I wanted to get torley.com up and running again. And I am thankful for that as well.

Oooh! I just got an issue of Elle Girl magazine in the post. I like to read fashion/megatrends/lifestyle magazines for both female and male genders so that I might learn what is socially popular. Avril Lavigne is on the cover. She rocks! In this magazine, she looks like an edgy ballerina and her skin is like the finest porcelain slash alabaster. I like her cat's-eye makeup. Always have, and I think, always will.

On the J(apanese)-pop front, it has been said that Japanese Acts Woo U.S. Through Anime. Obviously, cultural differences come into play and there's got to be more coming over than pretty girls singing pop songs, because we have plenty of that here as it stands. Interjective thought: Puffy AmiYumi have a cartoon I will likely never see because 1) I no longer get Cartoon Network and 2) I hardly watch TV, but?I wish them well with their new audiovisual media enterprise. They have one song, "Tokyo Nights", which sounds very much like the standard "Radio Killed The Video Star" which is nothing less than a paramount favorite of Mr. Zephos's.

*Ahem.* I would like to focus on unique personalities like that of Utada, who has her Stateside debut coming soon. I don't want to use the word "Americanized" (what does that mean anyway? There are so many pockets of Americana) but I'll go ahead and use it and?I hope it reflects her original artistic vision. I am still stumped why something like "Travelling" was not released as a single here — granted, the English translation of the lyrics was odd, but no odder than a Shakira hit featuring seven-legged cats. That is awesome pop production and the video is luscious sight to behold, a real visual feast slash treat. It has been noted that Utada admires Bjork. I hope the two of them shack up and collaborate. Speaking of obvious ideas finally exploited, Bjork has an exciting new album which is all (almost all?)?vocals. Including vocals used as all manner of instruments including percussion beatboxing and perhaps stringy orchestrations too. If you think, "Rahzel must be involved in something like this", indeed you are right, and he is.

In the trance cliche dept. which I enjoy having fun with: Got SUPERSAW?

2004-08-21
What is techno music? What does it mean to me?
More thoughtful discussion over at TranceAddict happened today. "TECHNO" is a big, puffy word, not unlike those little pillowy guys who advertise toilet paper. Sorry, I forget their names at the moment, but I'm a sucker for cute mascots. So being a type of person who will knowingly embrace contradictions, I wanted to respectfully answer mndeg's question:

how come you use the word techno as in all electronic music?
?

Most excellent question. Here's my answer why I use the word techno as in all electronic music.?I also touch on part of what techno means to me, and why I am obsessed with it… well, I allude to that bit subtlely. ;)
Words like these really rely on personal truths within you as a unique individual. What do I mean by that? Well, for 'stance, I mean that someone who's never had a wonderful clubbing experience — all sweaty and smiley and perhaps on drugs, perhaps not, but undeniably having an awesome time — is going to have a very different view of techno music than a lab scientist whose involvement in the music is more theoretical.

I am, of course, a hybrid of both and an appreciator of diversity, and in the future I will grow increasingly hungry for these experiences like Urgo (of Stargate SG-1 fame) is for pie. I'm a staunch DISBELIEVER in telling others what they should think?&?feel?when it comes to such a powerful, Teutonic?word as "TECHNO", and so, I share my information but leave their decisions up to them.

And this is how I learn!

Speaking of learning, I came across another couple of pages highlighting peaks of earlier electronic music, the first from the 60s. (Wow, that girl on the floral mattress looks so happily fine!) Here's the second one — the 70s! I?don't think they ever completed this series though. It was supposed to go up to the 90s, and never did.

Onwards, techno ho!

2004-08-20
Respect the roots of techno music, or the tree might fall on top of you!
It's no secret that the electronic world of techno music is still burgeoning and growing shoots and leaves in a variety of directions, spawning subcults of subgenres and substyles every what-it-seems-like fortnight. Like a brilliant symphony of firecrackers exploding across an already beautiful Aurora Borealis, the variety and diversity of what is one freakin' YUGE umbrella is staggering. Not to mention how electronic sounds have infiltrated — or more recently, boldly marched into — all manner of other kinds of music, from country to pop to rock to rolling on… and need I say the instrumental section of most hip-hop, which encapsulates not only synthesizers (i.e. Timbaland's take on the acid house sounds and his stuttered swing beats which bring to mind the jagged breaks of drum 'n' bass) and sampling (this one goes without an explanation)? To channel Ben Kingsley via proxy of Conan O'Brien, "Yes! Yes!! Yes!!!"

It's no surprise then, that it is really hard to catch up with the present which bridges into the future. And by extension, that makes it all the more difficult to trace the roots of the music, and in a parallel way, enjoy what came before because we are so used to the beefed-up sounds of today that many younguns think that Kraftwerk sounds thin and tinny without even stopping to think of the context of the times.?Oh, how we take things for granted! Yes, we have plenty of room of improvement, but we've come such a?long way, baby.?We live in a hyper-age of attention deficit. Next! Well, the pioneers pride themselves on their in-contrast-to-today beeps and bleeps, and perhaps that's the point. A stylistic beauty unique to them which heralded synthesizers as being part of pop music's repertoire of instrumentation during a time where most of these music-making machines were associated with academic experiments which the people by far and large cannot relate to.

There is no room for ignorance in a TECHNOlogically-based music form that prides itself on attention to technical detail and inscrutable knowledge of digital facts, plastered all over the mind's ear like a beehive full of angry buzzers that has just fallen on top of a poor critter (take your pick: whale, porcupine, or amoeba). Clubbers talk about the trance of today and the house of here and there and the progressive which is oddly regressive, and they know what exists NOW, but they do not know of names like Kraftwerk, Larry Fast, Can, Perry & Kingsley, Juan Atkins, and onwards. Oh, perhaps they've heard of them, and the words do convey a message but remember this: the music is a message all its own, and it deserves to be heard. With digital technology such as the internet (capitalize it if you wish), finding music from previously in the timeline is no great chore, and one must not make excuses to search out "classical electronic music" dating back to the 60s and even before — if you happen to have an itchin' for the eerie theremin stylings of Clara Rockwell.

So if you feel tempted to discover more and expand your horizons and vertical/diagonal whatevers, go ahead! Enjoy!?(It's like a family tree, albeit one that may prove to have?far more chemicals involved and illegitimate children than your biological relations.)?Seek out progressive trance before it was called that and was "humbly" known as epic house.?Search for techno classics in the day before WYHIWYG sequencers?or even?the pivotal points where the trains of tech and hip-hop merged, coughing up many an electro breakdance spectacular in the 80s like the Bambaataa-beaten "Planet Rock". You don't have to like it?– and you should NEVER force yourself to — but you should give it a spirited ears open, because you never know what gems you might come across that really move you. It's not ancestor worship; it's paying the utmost respect to the greats of the team who had a hard time getting the novel electronic sounds out to the public. And guess what? The next generation will say that about us too.?All good things in time.

Also, I wholeheartedly recommend that you read interviews with today's luminaries and look up who they looked up to, and track it back from there. Not only do you get a better appreciation of where X DJ or Y producer is coming from, you'll be able to fill in more pieces of the puzzle of your own listening preferences. Don't forget Google and Wikipedia!?Speaking of information authorities, here are a few of many sources I, an eccentric autistic,?am pleased to learn from:

  • the allmusic database - Slow to navigate, but the one and only! Link one thing to another and your associative thinking will improve impressively.

  • fye - A music store connected to the above and has plenty of sound samples. Note my emphasis on "sound samples" to come. ;)

  • Ishkur's EDM Guide - Full of snarky fun, but read the disclaimers first. The audio samples make this CHOICE!

  • Modulations - A documentary which I've watched several times. Not as spastic as I hoped it would be, but solid. Serious electronic music references are rare because the genre is still young, so stay tuned…

  • 120 Years of Electronic Music - The name says it all, but the only way you'll really get it is by listening to the music. Thankfully, sound samples are provided. There is NO substitute for the actual music, never forget!

  • hyperreal - I've mentioned this before, and it is a super-valuable/invaluable archive. It covers more recent times up to the bulk of the early and mid-90s, but with precocious 11-year-olds getting into the groove, they were in diapers then like rave babies. And Kraftwerk must be MECHA-DINOSAURS. LOL.

From these pages, you will find oodles of further links to follow — ain't hypertext and the World Wide Web?a beauty for being such a beast? So who are Torley Wong's personal favorites of the old vanguard? Here's a sampling of ace memories: Yellow Magic Orchestra's "Rydeen" (this is not the original version);?the lo-fi-before-lo-fi-was-cool expressions of Rob Hubbard;?w-w-Wendy Carlos's Switched-On Bach; Vangelis and his "Chariots of Fire" antics and beyond, which everyone knows the tune of but how many people can name the composer?; Orbital's "Satan" (God bless them); the big, brassy tubular bells; Jan Hammer's soundtrack to Beyond The Mind's Eye, a certain Tangerine Dream album; and Yanni's Keys To Imagination?which still ranks in my book today as one of the crowning achievements of melodic, emotional electronic music.

Please DON'T namedrop the same albums that other people do if you've listened and found you don't actually like them. Don't contort to pressure to conform and?"be cool" because?you're a unique individual with?tastes all your own.?So don't pretend, just be you. It's one big musical buffet, this techno music palette. You may not like every dish but none of them are particularly lethal or poisonous (unless you play them at high volumes and kill your hearing :( ), so give each nook and cranny a try and come back for seconds, thirds, ad infinitum!

It is only by knowing what you already like that you will find more of what you like.

Above all, don't forget the fun. Go! (like the seminal?Moby single)

2004-08-19
Within the technosphere: "best artist" and annoyances pertaining to it
DJ Cinos had the following to say on TranceAddict:

Why do you think that some people…
Say stuff like "Tiesto is the most talented producer ever" (or replace Tiesto with PvD, Armin, Picotto… whomever)?

It's obviously not true, and it annoys me to no end. Sure, they're good, but nowhere NEAR the best. Sorry if I'm ranting, but…

Good question. Needless to say, this got discussion started as to the possible deductive reasoning behind all of this