<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: [DEAL] FabFilter Twin + Volcano + Timeless for $100 at MUPromo</title>
	<atom:link href="http://torley.com/deal-fabfilter-twin-volcano-timeless-for-100-at-mupromo/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://torley.com/deal-fabfilter-twin-volcano-timeless-for-100-at-mupromo</link>
	<description>Home of the musical Dream Journal.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 04:37:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Torley</title>
		<link>http://torley.com/deal-fabfilter-twin-volcano-timeless-for-100-at-mupromo/comment-page-1#comment-53634</link>
		<dc:creator>Torley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 01:46:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torley.com/deal-fabfilter-twin-volcano-timeless-for-100-at-mupromo#comment-53634</guid>
		<description>@j.gilkey You call out a REALLY GOOD POINT on their consistent look &#039;n&#039; feel. I know Native Instruments has tried to have similar operation across their plugins, but since there are many more complexities, same sorts of things (like sound browsers) *feel* different in, say, Absynth than Massive.

I&#039;m fond of the unison in Twin so far... reminds me of when I used to stack things up on my Access Virus Rack, only phatter!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@j.gilkey You call out a REALLY GOOD POINT on their consistent look &#039;n&#039; feel. I know Native Instruments has tried to have similar operation across their plugins, but since there are many more complexities, same sorts of things (like sound browsers) *feel* different in, say, Absynth than Massive.</p>
<p>I&#039;m fond of the unison in Twin so far&#8230; reminds me of when I used to stack things up on my Access Virus Rack, only phatter!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: j.gilkey</title>
		<link>http://torley.com/deal-fabfilter-twin-volcano-timeless-for-100-at-mupromo/comment-page-1#comment-53597</link>
		<dc:creator>j.gilkey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 04:29:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torley.com/deal-fabfilter-twin-volcano-timeless-for-100-at-mupromo#comment-53597</guid>
		<description>I for one think these are some of the most unappreciated plug-ins. Despite very good reviews, I do not here a lot from users praising them. Maybe the layout just works for me, but the design makes them way user friendly once you get the feel for them. Plus when you do, they all use basically the same layout. I won&#039;t even get into the firestorm of sound quality comparisons, but I will put my money on the TWIN vs. any softsynth out there. Those oscillators get dirtier than dos chicas un cupa</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I for one think these are some of the most unappreciated plug-ins. Despite very good reviews, I do not here a lot from users praising them. Maybe the layout just works for me, but the design makes them way user friendly once you get the feel for them. Plus when you do, they all use basically the same layout. I won&#039;t even get into the firestorm of sound quality comparisons, but I will put my money on the TWIN vs. any softsynth out there. Those oscillators get dirtier than dos chicas un cupa</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
