<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Orwellian references are boring &#8212; let&#8217;s plunder Philip K. Dick</title>
	<atom:link href="http://torley.com/orwellian-references-are-boring-lets-plunder-philip-k-dick/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://torley.com/orwellian-references-are-boring-lets-plunder-philip-k-dick</link>
	<description>Home of the musical Dream Journal.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 09:38:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Torley</title>
		<link>http://torley.com/orwellian-references-are-boring-lets-plunder-philip-k-dick/comment-page-1#comment-44186</link>
		<dc:creator>Torley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 18:28:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torley.com/orwellian-references-are-boring-lets-plunder-philip-k-dick#comment-44186</guid>
		<description>@Mari: Yes, Godwin&#039;s Law and all that! Spoiled fruit at that, too... since I prize creativity.

@Nicholaz: I was looking for instances where PKD refers to Owell. I felt there must be some influence (to paraphrase Newton, we see farther from the shoulders of giants), and this gem showed up: http://totaldickhead.blogspot.com/2008/06/old-vertex-magazine-pkd-interview-and.html Specifically on page 7, in the lower-left.

Incidentally, I had actually read the cited work, The Android and the Human ( http://www.philipkdickfans.com/pkdweb/The%20Android%20and%20the%20Human.htm ), and while terribly dense and challenging at parts, I&#039;d call it the closest I&#039;ve seen so far about PKD&#039;s views on Orwell&#039;s writings.

As for references, I tend to mix things up, but have a proportion of obscure references — I continually hope people will help popularize things which deserve attention by seeking them out.

@CyFishy: Since PKD&#039;s work keeps riding the Hollywood train and he&#039;s in the Library of America, I hope his work — and its relevancy to our Third Wave (as Alvin Toffler wrote) societies — continues to rise.

@Kim: Ubik had some wonderfully sly subtext about marketing! =)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Mari: Yes, Godwin&#039;s Law and all that! Spoiled fruit at that, too&#8230; since I prize creativity.</p>
<p>@Nicholaz: I was looking for instances where PKD refers to Owell. I felt there must be some influence (to paraphrase Newton, we see farther from the shoulders of giants), and this gem showed up: <a href="http://totaldickhead.blogspot.com/2008/06/old-vertex-magazine-pkd-interview-and.html" rel="nofollow">http://totaldickhead.blogspot.com/2008/06/old-vertex-magazine-pkd-interview-and.html</a> Specifically on page 7, in the lower-left.</p>
<p>Incidentally, I had actually read the cited work, The Android and the Human ( <a href="http://www.philipkdickfans.com/pkdweb/The%20Android%20and%20the%20Human.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.philipkdickfans.com/pkdweb/The%20Android%20and%20the%20Human.htm</a> ), and while terribly dense and challenging at parts, I&#039;d call it the closest I&#039;ve seen so far about PKD&#039;s views on Orwell&#039;s writings.</p>
<p>As for references, I tend to mix things up, but have a proportion of obscure references — I continually hope people will help popularize things which deserve attention by seeking them out.</p>
<p>@CyFishy: Since PKD&#039;s work keeps riding the Hollywood train and he&#039;s in the Library of America, I hope his work — and its relevancy to our Third Wave (as Alvin Toffler wrote) societies — continues to rise.</p>
<p>@Kim: Ubik had some wonderfully sly subtext about marketing! =)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kim Anubis</title>
		<link>http://torley.com/orwellian-references-are-boring-lets-plunder-philip-k-dick/comment-page-1#comment-43420</link>
		<dc:creator>Kim Anubis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 22:50:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torley.com/orwellian-references-are-boring-lets-plunder-philip-k-dick#comment-43420</guid>
		<description>PK Dick&#039;s The Man in the High Castle was required reading for some English classes at my high school.  That said, I follow your point, but . . . Dick does make a nice change from all the Orwell references and I think Tor&#039;s right about that gaussian blur over Orwell&#039;s works.  Last time I re-read 1984 it was really refreshing to see again what it actually said, clearly, without peering through the fog of memories of things that people attribute to it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PK Dick&#039;s The Man in the High Castle was required reading for some English classes at my high school.  That said, I follow your point, but . . . Dick does make a nice change from all the Orwell references and I think Tor&#039;s right about that gaussian blur over Orwell&#039;s works.  Last time I re-read 1984 it was really refreshing to see again what it actually said, clearly, without peering through the fog of memories of things that people attribute to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CyFishy Traveler</title>
		<link>http://torley.com/orwellian-references-are-boring-lets-plunder-philip-k-dick/comment-page-1#comment-43418</link>
		<dc:creator>CyFishy Traveler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 22:38:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torley.com/orwellian-references-are-boring-lets-plunder-philip-k-dick#comment-43418</guid>
		<description>Pretty much seconding what Nicholaz said--the reason we use such references is because they provide a simple shorthand for certain concepts.

E. D. Hirch, Jr. came up with the term &quot;cultural literacy&quot; for the knowledge needed grasp common references.  In other words, the reason we need to learn Shakespeare in high school isn&#039;t just as literature, but so we can understand what the heck people are talking about when they refer to &lt;i&gt;Hamlet&lt;/i&gt; or &lt;i&gt;Romeo and Juliet&lt;/i&gt;.

In the US at least, Orwell is taught in high school.  Dick isn&#039;t.  Ergo, an Orwellian reference will be understood more readily than a Dickian one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pretty much seconding what Nicholaz said&#8211;the reason we use such references is because they provide a simple shorthand for certain concepts.</p>
<p>E. D. Hirch, Jr. came up with the term &#034;cultural literacy&#034; for the knowledge needed grasp common references.  In other words, the reason we need to learn Shakespeare in high school isn&#039;t just as literature, but so we can understand what the heck people are talking about when they refer to <i>Hamlet</i> or <i>Romeo and Juliet</i>.</p>
<p>In the US at least, Orwell is taught in high school.  Dick isn&#039;t.  Ergo, an Orwellian reference will be understood more readily than a Dickian one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kim Anubis</title>
		<link>http://torley.com/orwellian-references-are-boring-lets-plunder-philip-k-dick/comment-page-1#comment-43385</link>
		<dc:creator>Kim Anubis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 18:38:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torley.com/orwellian-references-are-boring-lets-plunder-philip-k-dick#comment-43385</guid>
		<description>&quot;Ubik drops you back in the thick of things fast. Taken as directed, Ubik speeds relief to head and stomach. Remember: Ubik is only seconds away. Avoid prolonged use.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#034;Ubik drops you back in the thick of things fast. Taken as directed, Ubik speeds relief to head and stomach. Remember: Ubik is only seconds away. Avoid prolonged use.&#034;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
