Personal Branding Blanding Blog

2009-01-09

Social media has become the equivalent of commercial hippiewear: it's much more convenient to buy a prefab tie-dye shirt than make one yourself, and while it may appear great, there's not an interesting story behind it. (That changes if you wear the shirt and get into some strange counterculture misadventures, but that's another… story.)

Some people get afraid with all these 21st-century buzzwords passing by them like spinners after replicants. I feel your fear, dudes. And I'm here to tell you so much of it ultimately results in nothing. Just like the 1,000 archetypical fake MySpace friends you don't really know, those numbers… don't add up. But that's been brought up too many times. So let me move on!

There are way too many copycats parroting the same words. Talking about "personal branding", yet ironically having no personality themselves. They're as boring as boredom being bored. Tsk tsk if you're biting Rohit Bhargava, Andy Sernovitz, Tom Peters, or Dan Schnabel: it's one thing to be influenced by their inspirational teaching, it's another — and a lousy other at that — to have nothing to add to the conversation.

You want proof? I'll substantiate. Do a Google blog search on some of these buzzwords. Heck, might as well start with "personal branding". Notice how many look like they were written by the same person? The same phrases get rearranged into slightly different orders, time after time. It's like a bizarre web of tolerated plagiarism, or at the very best, ideological incest. In cases like that, I find it more useful (and polite) to quote the author without ripping it off buzz-verbatim. (DIMINISHING RETURNS!)

The Emperor's filthy old clothes: none of the fundamentals of being a self-promotional human are new, just marketed that way. Yes, the tools at our disposal are fresh. But there was a time before the modern corporation where the local mason or what-have-you-handyman would need to ply his wares and get the word out on the street. The real street, not a virtual representation of it. And I think it's delightful and fantastic to be able to connect personally all across the world.

But don't buy into the hokum bunk. Social media lowlifes, stop smelling and copying others' droppings; they've already digested the good parts, and what you're left with is rancid feces. Brutal, I know. But that's how it is. I can't domesticate poo by dressing it in post-Xmas-bargain reindeer antlers and a bow tie. Hunt for your own material — as every ethical comedian does — and also on the comedy tip, here's a simple rule for personal branding: if it can't be easily parodied (e.g., on The Simpsons), then it's not exceptional.*

Here is a picture of Christopher Walken. He epitomizes personal branding without calling it that. Each of us can learn a lot about personal branding, a little at a time, from Christopher Walken.

* It may have its own merits, but personal branding isn't one of them. More often than you might think, it's better to fit in than stand out. And we need all kinds of fruits in our horn of plenty.

{ 6 comments… read them below or add one }

chris 2009-01-09 at 12:15 PM UTC

Exactly!

lr 2009-01-09 at 2:43 PM UTC

no. he epitomizes "personality" not "branding".. the "branding" is what others need to do to "accept" him.If not described by "modern product consumer society" ways, is he "nothing"?

Has genuine human iconoclastic behavior in the day of the "mass digital consumer" copied virtual world, been pronounced dead? It seems today that the reach for the genuine by those caught blindly in the media ether finds only the latter generations of that original.

Were we ever more than "media"? maybe. Are we going to be? Hopefully, but not for a while, the damage runs too deep.

c3lr

Martin Buckland 2009-01-09 at 7:44 PM UTC

Perfect! Thanks.

Torley 2009-01-10 at 10:46 AM UTC

Thanx!

@Ir: Are you referring to Christopher Walken?

Tweed Woodget 2009-01-10 at 2:45 PM UTC

It's a given that avant-garde personalities (like Christopher Walken, Harvey Keitel, Johnny Depp, Kurt Colbain, etc)are emulated and admired because of their unswerving commitment to their principles as artists. The overwhelming majority of the rest of the "wannabes" merely copy their styles, mannerisms or philosophies while the originators have already moved on. Even the term "personal branding" bespeaks a certain personal cultural and sociological vacuum. We all have personal branding: it's called a personality, character.
As you so aptly put it, in olden days the craftsmen made a living by word of mouth and reputation, (they had no choice), not by pretending someone elses work was their own. The complexity and relative anonimity of our society enables this plagiarism to occur. Corporate "branding" is a meaningless, soulless attempt to connect at some level with the consumer, but anyone with a glimmer of intelligence knows that it stops at the marketing level: in most companies, only a handful of businesses "live" their corporate philosophy. The pressure is on people to innovate, and the vast majority are not up to the effort (bell shaped curve), but the easy access to media enables the mediocre to delude themselves into thinking they can.

lr 2009-01-10 at 3:10 PM UTC

ir? lr.

Yes. Walken having a distinct singular human "personality" and not a "brand". Only the media/ machine around "him" needs to label for the consumation of his job getting as an actor.

the real question is, as the other poster began to hit on…

are we only to consume- be "consumers" to "every facet-act" in our lives… ? if so, then let all things and ones "brand away!" and if so then we've gotten the "reality" we deserve.

if not, then the gulf between who we may be and our personas in the current mediated world may be finally realized as too large to stomach any more by an increasing number of those engulfed by the modern media of the last 50-so years.

its all kinda simple…. only when one can "see behind the curtain" does one loose the fantasy of OZ.

and as the "consumer"– is required to again " create their own realities" are they also made clearly aware of the actual "worth" of the realities they allowed themselves to be made a part of in their past.

The only hope for VR worlds/ mass media and the silly realities fostered in them, is the final awareness and realization by those so called "consumers" in them, is that they CAN leave them.

After 5 years of blogging and facebooking, and lindening , true adult humans may realize this. At least thats my hope.;)

c3

Leave a Comment