<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Risk of exposure</title>
	<atom:link href="http://torley.com/risk-of-exposure/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://torley.com/risk-of-exposure</link>
	<description>Home of the musical Dream Journal.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 09:38:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maggie Darwin</title>
		<link>http://torley.com/risk-of-exposure/comment-page-1#comment-53402</link>
		<dc:creator>Maggie Darwin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 04:10:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torley.com/risk-of-exposure#comment-53402</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve seen 100 chickens. 

I don&#039;t want to feed them, and I certainly don&#039;t want to smell them. :-) 

Eggs, please. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;ve seen 100 chickens. </p>
<p>I don&#039;t want to feed them, and I certainly don&#039;t want to smell them. <img src='http://torley.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
<p>Eggs, please. <img src='http://torley.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Barbieux</title>
		<link>http://torley.com/risk-of-exposure/comment-page-1#comment-53395</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Barbieux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 19:31:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torley.com/risk-of-exposure#comment-53395</guid>
		<description>Gee Torley, that is so true.  I see this in poor and homeless people.  It is often hard for them to give up what little they do have, even when others promise better things ahead.  And it&#039;s also true of wealthy people, who are afraid to sacrifice even a small portion of what they have, even though it could bring a great improvement in someone elses life.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gee Torley, that is so true.  I see this in poor and homeless people.  It is often hard for them to give up what little they do have, even when others promise better things ahead.  And it&#039;s also true of wealthy people, who are afraid to sacrifice even a small portion of what they have, even though it could bring a great improvement in someone elses life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Lopez</title>
		<link>http://torley.com/risk-of-exposure/comment-page-1#comment-53387</link>
		<dc:creator>John Lopez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 17:55:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torley.com/risk-of-exposure#comment-53387</guid>
		<description>I think you will enjoy this: http://www.ted.com/talks/qi_zhang_s_electrifying_organ_performance.html

If you aren&#039;t watching, it sounds like a full orchestra. The merit of a grand piano is the ability to produce a *specific* sound perfectly, no emulation required. The merit of synthetic sound is the ability to create something else, something that I think has as much merit as a traditional piano does. 

Yes it is different, but different is how progress is made. I doubt that traditional pianos will ever &quot;die&quot;, because there will always be demand for the specific sound and expressiveness of the traditional piano. I would argue this performance is expressive as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you will enjoy this: <a href="http://www.ted.com/talks/qi_zhang_s_electrifying_organ_performance.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.ted.com/talks/qi_zhang_s_electrifying_organ_performance.html</a></p>
<p>If you aren&#039;t watching, it sounds like a full orchestra. The merit of a grand piano is the ability to produce a *specific* sound perfectly, no emulation required. The merit of synthetic sound is the ability to create something else, something that I think has as much merit as a traditional piano does. </p>
<p>Yes it is different, but different is how progress is made. I doubt that traditional pianos will ever &#034;die&#034;, because there will always be demand for the specific sound and expressiveness of the traditional piano. I would argue this performance is expressive as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lorimae Undercroft</title>
		<link>http://torley.com/risk-of-exposure/comment-page-1#comment-53386</link>
		<dc:creator>Lorimae Undercroft</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 17:23:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torley.com/risk-of-exposure#comment-53386</guid>
		<description>Your posts like this always hit home and make me feel a little better each time I read :)

&lt;3</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your posts like this always hit home and make me feel a little better each time I read <img src='http://torley.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>&lt;3</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
