<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Worst. Singularity. Ever. aka how NOT to predict the future</title>
	<atom:link href="http://torley.com/worst-singularity-ever-aka-how-not-to-predict-the-future/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://torley.com/worst-singularity-ever-aka-how-not-to-predict-the-future</link>
	<description>Home of the musical Dream Journal.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 00:29:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Torley</title>
		<link>http://torley.com/worst-singularity-ever-aka-how-not-to-predict-the-future/comment-page-1#comment-50745</link>
		<dc:creator>Torley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 20:19:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torley.com/worst-singularity-ever-aka-how-not-to-predict-the-future#comment-50745</guid>
		<description>@Jean-Marie: Me too, otherwise we&#039;re going to be living the future portrayed in the Terminator shows! (As in, Catherine Weaver as CEO of ZeiraCorp).

@CyFishy: Even accounting for drastically different interpretations of what a &quot;narrative game&quot; is, yes, you nailed it.

@Speedmaster: That&#039;s one of my fave games! Haha, &quot;cloud computing&quot; is one of my UNfavorites. It helps to label things to identify them easier, it&#039;s true. But no one deserves to attach meaning to emptiness.

@Loraan: Aye, without definitions and some clarity, it&#039;s just so grossly LOLarious. I wonder if this chart makes Edward Tufte, nemesis of bad PowerPoint, bawl his eyes out! Have you heard of him?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jean-Marie: Me too, otherwise we&#039;re going to be living the future portrayed in the Terminator shows! (As in, Catherine Weaver as CEO of ZeiraCorp).</p>
<p>@CyFishy: Even accounting for drastically different interpretations of what a &#034;narrative game&#034; is, yes, you nailed it.</p>
<p>@Speedmaster: That&#039;s one of my fave games! Haha, &#034;cloud computing&#034; is one of my UNfavorites. It helps to label things to identify them easier, it&#039;s true. But no one deserves to attach meaning to emptiness.</p>
<p>@Loraan: Aye, without definitions and some clarity, it&#039;s just so grossly LOLarious. I wonder if this chart makes Edward Tufte, nemesis of bad PowerPoint, bawl his eyes out! Have you heard of him?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Loraan Fierrens</title>
		<link>http://torley.com/worst-singularity-ever-aka-how-not-to-predict-the-future/comment-page-1#comment-50734</link>
		<dc:creator>Loraan Fierrens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 04:38:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torley.com/worst-singularity-ever-aka-how-not-to-predict-the-future#comment-50734</guid>
		<description>What a hoot. This is the sort of bullet-pointed nonsense I see at work all the time (although perhaps not quite this bad). I honestly don&#039;t know which part is the worst/funniest here. Maybe the &quot;30 percent of all celebrities are synthetic&quot; comment. What with botox and all, haven&#039;t we already reached that point? ;-)

More seriously though, this gets at something I&#039;ve been concerned about at work for a while. Bullet points are _bad_. It&#039;s too easy to sit down and do a presentation with a mess of bullet points and have your audience walk away from it thinking they understood something. It&#039;s also too easy for those bullet points to be hiding the fact that there is no content in your presentation and no thought.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a hoot. This is the sort of bullet-pointed nonsense I see at work all the time (although perhaps not quite this bad). I honestly don&#039;t know which part is the worst/funniest here. Maybe the &#034;30 percent of all celebrities are synthetic&#034; comment. What with botox and all, haven&#039;t we already reached that point? <img src='http://torley.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>More seriously though, this gets at something I&#039;ve been concerned about at work for a while. Bullet points are _bad_. It&#039;s too easy to sit down and do a presentation with a mess of bullet points and have your audience walk away from it thinking they understood something. It&#039;s also too easy for those bullet points to be hiding the fact that there is no content in your presentation and no thought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Speedmaster Bing</title>
		<link>http://torley.com/worst-singularity-ever-aka-how-not-to-predict-the-future/comment-page-1#comment-50728</link>
		<dc:creator>Speedmaster Bing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 00:18:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torley.com/worst-singularity-ever-aka-how-not-to-predict-the-future#comment-50728</guid>
		<description>When I see, or hear, stuff similar to that it always reminds me of http://www.bullshitbingo.net/
Web 2.0 (I&#039;m still waiting for my Service pack 1 to patch my intertubes) and cloud computing (Isn&#039;t Second Life per definition already running in &quot;the cloud&quot;?) seems to be the buzzwords today, covering up they are terms for old technology ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I see, or hear, stuff similar to that it always reminds me of <a href="http://www.bullshitbingo.net/" rel="nofollow">http://www.bullshitbingo.net/</a><br />
Web 2.0 (I&#039;m still waiting for my Service pack 1 to patch my intertubes) and cloud computing (Isn&#039;t Second Life per definition already running in &#034;the cloud&#034;?) seems to be the buzzwords today, covering up they are terms for old technology <img src='http://torley.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CyFishy Traveler</title>
		<link>http://torley.com/worst-singularity-ever-aka-how-not-to-predict-the-future/comment-page-1#comment-50727</link>
		<dc:creator>CyFishy Traveler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 23:35:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://torley.com/worst-singularity-ever-aka-how-not-to-predict-the-future#comment-50727</guid>
		<description>Wait, &quot;Narrative Games&quot; just showed up in 2008?  Just now?

Narrative games have been around since, cripes, text-based stuff back in the 80s.  Infocom built a whole company on them.  Douglas Adams wrote a couple of them.  This is SO not anything new.

I&#039;m in the process of writing a novel set in the far-flung future and what&#039;s embarrassing is how technology is catching up and surpassing the stuff I come up with.  (Fortunately, it&#039;s not intended for publication, just for my own personal entertainment.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wait, &#034;Narrative Games&#034; just showed up in 2008?  Just now?</p>
<p>Narrative games have been around since, cripes, text-based stuff back in the 80s.  Infocom built a whole company on them.  Douglas Adams wrote a couple of them.  This is SO not anything new.</p>
<p>I&#039;m in the process of writing a novel set in the far-flung future and what&#039;s embarrassing is how technology is catching up and surpassing the stuff I come up with.  (Fortunately, it&#039;s not intended for publication, just for my own personal entertainment.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
